Dollars and Sense
Question: Why do banks wait so long to sell a
repossessed house? Some of them are falling apart
Answer: Based on my experience, it is usually 6
to 10 months before we get a foreclosed property
sold. Lenders have their attorneys do the
necessary paperwork to foreclose and then it sits for
months primarily due to the backlog of
houses that are on the list for a Sheriff's sale. Over
the past 10 years there have been from 150 to
200 per year in Defiance County. The Sheriff
has requirements to meet to keep it in
accordance with the law. There are appraisals that have
to be made to determine the value and
notices that have to be published. If I had total
it as a banker, we would sell them immediately. Unfortunately, it
isn't up to the lender so we
wait our turn. On top of all this, the borrower often files for
bankruptcy during this time which
adds to the delay. It is very frustrating for lenders when we have
to wait so long to getback
the property to sell. The majority of properties do not get sold at
auction and lenders get the property back to repair before
selling. The lender loses money at least 90% of the
Question: Why do some banks, when approached to buy
a CD, say you have to have an account with them
to purchase a CD?
Answer: As a general rule, this is not the policy
for most banks. It's actually rare for banks to do this.
For those that do require you to have an
account with them to purchase a CD, there are two
primary reasons. The first is that they
want to force you to have a checking or savings
account which ties you closer to the bank. The
other reason has to do with banker's views of CD
onlycustomers. CD's alone are the least
profitable product for banks. Most bankers feel that
CDonly customers are not as loyal and the
individual that purchases one without any other business relationship is likely going to
leave you when it matures if they can find a better
rateelsewhere. I have never gone so far as to
require a checking account relationship in order to
allow someone to purchase a CD. However,
I certainly understand to some degree why somebankers do it. The primary reason behind
bankers not wanting CD's from individuals who don't
have any other relationships and those
who do want them is loan demand. If the banker has
alot of loans to fund, it doesn't matter
nearly as much about the additional relationships.
Ingeneral, bankers would prefer more than
just the CD.
Question: What do you say to people who don't use
banks and they just hide their money at home?
Answer: If someone keeps all their money hidden
at home and it is stolen, I would like to be there
when they ask their insurance company to cover
the loss. It should be good for a laugh. With all
due respect to those individuals who do not
believe in banks, keeping money in jars and cans is
just not using your head and I'm aware that
there are some who do this. It's not safe. There are
extremists in this country that have
people believing the government is going to take over
all of their assets including all the money
in banks. That's about as farfetched as fortune
tellerssaying the world is going to end on a
certain date. Even if you own a safe in your home, it
isn'tas secure as your bank. Some would say
that an individual who would do this is just
eccentric. I think it goes a bit further than just
being eccentric. It's irrational. You are not only
putting your money at risk. You are risking your
personal safety. It's a bad idea.
young people graduating from high school today with better
financial skills than kids did 40-50
Answer: It depends more on how the parents
address this issue than what they learn in school. We
should not rely totally on the schools to
educate our young people. Financial literacy should
begin at home. Although our bank sponsors
a program of financial literacy in our schools,
youshould not rely totally on this training.
If your child someday marries someone who has
beentaught how to handle finances and your
child hasn't, it will most definitely end up causing
problems. You can almost count on it
happening. I couldn't begin to count the number of
timesI've seen this happen. One spouse cannot
control their spending habits resulting in a poor
credit rating for both. There are many
lessons we need to teach our kids while they are still
athome. Financial literacy is one of the
more important ones. Unfortunately, I would have to
say that kids today are less concerned about
financial matters than they were 40-50 years ago.
We can thank our government for much of this
in creating the out of control welfare system.
Question: We hear some say take your social
security as soon as possible. Others say wait. Which way
everyone were financially able to wait until the age of 70, I would
say wait. Since they aren't,there
is no right or wrong age to start drawing social security. If you
could wait until the age of 70 it
would maximize your monthly income vs. the minimum amount at age
62. Also, from the age
of 66 until the age of 70, if you have not drawn your social
security, the amount will go up about
8% per year. In other words, waiting the additional 4 years could
result in roughly a 32% higher amount than if taken at 66 years
of age. For example, if projections call for you to
receive $1,500 per month, waiting the
extra 4 years will result in your check being about
$2,000 per month. That's a significant increase.
The majority of retirees do not wait until 70 years
of age. Again, there is no right or wrong. It's
just a matter of whether you can retire at 62
and take the smaller amount or, wait and
maximize the amount at age 70.
Question: Are U.S. Savings Bonds still
Answer: In 1935, Savings Bonds were first
introduced to the public. They have been called by
different names over the years. During World War
II, they were referred to as War Bonds. Up untilJanuary 1, 2012, they could be purchased
at any bank. They are no longer sold at banks
and purchasers now have to go on-line or
through mail service to purchase them. I don't have
any solid numbers as to their current
popularity. However, I would imagine they are less
the convenience of buying them at your local bank was discontinued.
Also, World War II was
considered to be a popular war and many Americans purchased them
back then as a patriotic act and not just an investment.
Attitudes have changed since then about wars.
We've been involved in several questionable
military actions so they are purchased more for the
investment than to be patriotic. When you
are purchasing a U.S. Savings Bond, you are basically making a loan to our government
and they are paying you interest for the loan.
Question: Is there a reason why banks advertise
higher interest rates for larger deposits?
Answer: Financial institutions sometimes offer a
special rate. When they do, it usually requires a
larger amount. Let's say the figure is $50,000.
The reason is simple. It takes the same amount of
time to prepare documentation for a $100 CD as
it does for a $50,000 CD. If the goal is to bring in
an additional $1 million in deposits to fund
loans, it can be done with the higher dollar
amount with much less employee time than if they
allowed the special rate on a much lower figure. It's
no different than what we see when retail
stores offer a product and the more you buy, the
better the price. Or, they may advertise
buy one get a second at half price. It's basically
the same concept except the bank isn't
selling you an item. They are investing your money.
The single biggest expense any business has
is labor cost. The higher dollar amount allows them
to attain their objective with less time.
The average person does something along these lines
in their personal lives all the time. We do
things in the most efficient way possible to
accomplish the tasks.
Question: Why is it so difficult to get a loan with
the interest rate fixed for a long term?
Answer: A real estate loan to buy a home can have
a rate fixed for a long term if it's being sold in
the secondary market. This is about the only
way it's possible. The reason is simple. The majority
of a bank's customers will not go long term
on deposits. Most individuals won't purchase a CD
from their bank for longer than 2 to 4
years. Therefore, your bank can't take those deposits
and loan it at a fixed rate for 10-30
years because if CD rates go up, our customer will expect
a better rate when it matures even though
we would be stuck with the long term loan rate. It's
somewhat like asking a car dealer to
guarantee you a new car price in 5 years at today's
prices even though the dealer doesn't know what
the manufacturer is going to charge them for
the car in 5 years. Prudent bankers are not
going to guarantee a loan rate for 10 to 30 years
either. We just don't know how much we will be
paying for deposits that far out. We may do it for
5 to 7 years but not much longer than that
unless the loan is going to be sold.
Question: Some say that one Presidential candidate
is better than the other on the economy. Do you agree?
We have never seen anything quite
like this election and hopefully, we never will again.
The attitudes of people toward these two
candidates has resulted in us having to choose between the lesser of two evils. One
candidate has the financial background we would like
but, can't seem to stop putting his foot
in his mouth. The other candidate appears to have
more political experience but, lies about
anything and everything. Each person has to choose
whom they think will do the best job
overall. However, don't worry about either of
them making our economic conditions worse than
they already are. The President of the U.S. does not have the authority to bring our
economy down by themselves. Most critical decisions
must have the support of the U.S.
Congress and Senate. So, if there are mistakes made,
there will be plenty of blame to go around.
There are a lot of other issues that you need to look
at in making a choice. National Security and
integrity are just two of them.